Ðåôåðàòû - Àôîðèçìû - Ñëîâàðè
Ðóññêèå, áåëîðóññêèå è àíãëèéñêèå ñî÷èíåíèÿ
Ðóññêèå è áåëîðóññêèå èçëîæåíèÿ

Transformation of business: shift to the subscription economy

Ðàáîòà èç ðàçäåëà: «Ìàðêåòèíã, ðåêëàìà è òîðãîâëÿ»

Content

Introduction

Chapter 1. Market evolution

1.1.Transformation of business: shift to the subscription economy

1.2 Subscription based economy model overview: characteristics and functions

Chapter 2. Subscription Models applied in SaaS businesses

2.1 SaaS Subscription model: key features, market drivers and deterrents

2.2 SaaS in Russia: trends, problems and opportunities

2.3 The impact of SaaS subscription services on the economy and the society

Chapter 3. Real scenarios of SaaS infrastructures and applications

3.1 SaaS Subscription businesses: comparison of foreign and Russian cases

3.2 SaaS Subscription model in (ADD)

3.3 Success strategies to attract and retain subscribers

Conclusion

References

Application 1

Application 2

Application 3

Application 4

Application 5

Application 6

Introduction

The situation on the market is constantly changing. The nowadays consumers are more attentive and look for newer, more convenient and easier ways of accessing goods and services. There is a common idea of the “right now” need, which means that a product cannot be delivered later. It should come at the right moment to satisfy a spontaneous and transitory wish. But, at the same time, as it is known that the wish is transitory, there is a need to be able to stop using this product as fast as it is not useful anymore (Hutzler, August). They do not necessarily want to buy a product that can became very quickly old-fashioned or dysfunctional. In the report prepared by The Economist Intelligence Unit in 2014, it is said that “80 percent of customers are demanding new consumption models including subscribing, sharing, and leasing?--?anything except actually buying a product outright” (Tzuo, The subscription economy: a business transformation, 2015), in other words, that are the models that mainly respect an idea of temporary acquisition.

This means that businesses need to handle customer loyalty, pricing, and selling strategies in a very different way to keep their successful relationship with their consumers alive. Since consumers are trending towards a hassle-free shopping experience, more and more companies, looking for new growth opportunities, are changing their business strategies from a pay-per-product model to a subscription based model. Indeed, this subscription model is not new - for instance magazines and newspapers have been selling subscriptions for few centuries (Warrillow J., 2014). But, more recently, new sorts of industries have adopted the idea of intensifying the subscription based model selling strategy. The year 2007 was called by experts a focal milestone in the global shift from the traditional economy to the subscription economy (Zuora). Since then, over all the industries, this change happens more evidently in the software industry with the transition from a per-pay-use license model to the SaaS subscription model (Longanecker, 2015).

This paper is focused on the software-as-a-service (SaaS) as its success is becoming largely noticeable around the globe. Over the past few years, commercial cloud computing (SaaS is a part of this phenomenon) has been rapidly increasing in gaining market share (Darrow, 2011), making new possibilities available for both software vendors and consumers. These changes happen with a sustained attention of the traditional perpetual software markets: without deep knowledge about cloud computing, new business and revenue models, strategies of attracting and retaining consumers, they risk to lose their weight in this new business reality. In the research Global and Russian SaaS-Solutions Markets in B2B Segment presented by J'son & Partners Consulting in July, 2015 it is said that “In accordance with IDC forecasts, 27.8% of global corporate apps will be based on SaaS model by 2018, it will generate $50.8 bln revenue in comparison with $22.6 bln and market share of 16.6% in 2013” (Consulting, J'son & Partners, 2015).

SaaS subscription model is a global trend which could not stayed without attention in the Russian business landscape. Experts from Paralleles estimate that the share of SaaS in the cloud solutions sales in Russia reached about 70% and in the segment of small and medium businesses almost 90% over the last few years. Another analysis provided by iKS-Consulting estimates the pace of growth of SaaS market to be around 25% in 2015-2018. The SaaS market is growing despite the fact that the Russian IT industry is generally stagnating (CNews Analytic, 2015).

Problem statement

The leading players of the Russian software market express different opinions about perspectives of SaaS subscription model in Russia. While the smallest part of the software companies managed already to find and take their unique market niche and are successfully expanding their businesses now, the biggest part of suppliers demonstrates much modest growth of their SaaS services. But in this new realities, it is becoming important to understand how SaaS subscription model works and more challenging, how it is changing relationships between companies and consumers to use profits of basing a business on SaaS model.

Field of study

Subscription economy in Russia

Object of the research

SaaS subscription model

Objective

Derive particular strategies of attracting and retaining subscribers of SaaS platforms with the subscription business model.

Tasks

To achieve this objective, the following tasks are formulated:

1. Analyze theoretical and methodological aspects of the subscription economy;

2. Define features of the SaaS subscription business model;

3. Prepare and interpret a database of the cases of the Russian and foreign SaaS solutions for business with subscription business model;

4. Check hypothesis of the study that the subscription model, applied in a software company suit better clients' needs but it can distract clients if implemented carelessly.

Methodology

Structure-functional analyzes

Methods

General methods: Literature review, researching academic articles related to subscription economy and SaaS industry with focus on the subscription model and Russian SaaS market.

Empirical method: Case study

Research question

Will shifting from the traditional licensed model to the subscription model in the software business help attract new customers and turn old clients into subscribers?

The hypothesis of the study

Hypothesis: Hence customers have very specific needs but do not want to pay for a customized solution for their problems, the subscription model, applied in a software company, will suit better clients' needs.

Delimitations of the study

This paper studies a very specific kind of companies that implement the subscription model which are the software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies. The SaaS business model, in general, is quite well examined field in the literature. Nevertheless, it is still possible to find less explored issue such as the SaaS as a part of the subscription economy. Moreover, we will focus on studying SaaS subscription model applied by the Russian providers of the software solutions mainly for business purposes. This study is an attempt to bring new ideas into chosen issue, mainly concerned with the implication of this model into the Russian business landscape.

Professional significance

The research organizes and explains the basic theoretical concepts, practical tools and strategies of attracting and retaining subscribers in the subscription models applied in SaaS businesses.

Definitions of key terms

Subscription economy

This term describes the business process of offering subscriptions to consumers. It was not popular in consumer marketing until recently, yet there is an opinion that subscription concept is nothing new - for example, in publishing it goes back to 17th century. The term describes a new business landscape in which the traditional pay-per-product (or service) companies are moving toward the subscription-based business model. For some companies, their entire business relies on the subscription business model. Here can be named such companies as Netflix, Spotify, Zipcar, and all SaaS companies (Tzuo, The subscription economy: a business transformation, 2015).

SaaS Subscription model

A business model where a customer gets an access to the product or service after paying a subscription price. The model was pioneered in publishing few centuries ago - at least at 17th century, but is now used by many businesses in different industries (Longanecker, 2015). To clarify grammatical side of using the term “the SaaS subscription model”, we should notice that in our research, the terms “the SaaS subscription model” (sg.) and “the SaaS subscription models” (pl.) are equal and substitutable. But, being more precise, the term “the SaaS subscription model” (sg.) is used as a name of a general phenomenon in economics while “the SaaS subscription models” (pl.) phrase encompasses variable types of the SaaS subscriptions which is based on the classification which suggests two core SaaS subscription models:

1. Monthly Subscription Model: In the Monthly subscription model a client is charged and pays each month via credit card of automatic e-payments. An electronic license agreement does not include any fee or penalty for cancelation of the subscription at any time.

2. Term Subscription Model: In the Term subscription model a client pays for a certain period of time (mainly 3, 6 or 12 months). The subscription agreement frequently includes fees for cancellation during the term.

Software-as-a-service (SaaS)

A model of licensing and delivering software in which vendors or service providers, instead of selling it to companies, make it available to customers over the internet on rental base using cloud-computing technology.

Freemium

Freemium (from 'Free' and 'Premium') is considered to be a pricing and marketing strategy which can be applied in either the monthly or term subscription models when a core product is given for free to a large group of users and premium products are sold to a smaller fraction of this user base (Froberg, n.d.).

The current research paper Subscription Model applied in SaaS Subscription businesses: characteristics, functions, strategies to attract and retain subscribers consists of an introduction, three chapters, conclusion, references and applications.

Literature review

The paper is based on a deep review of the business and IT books and articles taken from professional sites. We also used information from professional forums and online versions of business newspapers which covered the chosen issue.

Understanding how firms do business is the first step to understand how a marketing strategy can affect a company's future. Business models have been widely explored in literature and it is increasingly suggested that business model innovation is a key to business success (Lev-Ram, 2014). Indeed, a business model is a concept that embodies architecture of a business with the aim of creating value for customers (Teece, 2010). In his work Teece says that business model articulates how the company will convert resources and capabilities into economic value. The business model follows the context where the company is inserted. To accomplish a revision of the business models, we put attention on the research A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes (Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P.,&Evans, S., 2014) where the authors give in-depth observation of the theoretical base of this subject. According to this paper, “a business model is a conceptual tool to help understand how a firm does business and can be used for analysis, comparison and performance assessment, management, communication, and innovation”.

Business models have been defined and categorized in many different ways. It is possible to think in two main business models, the traditional model and the internet based one (Rappa, 2008). In this paper we focus our attention on the internet subscription based model applied in SaaS.

Studying the SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) business model is one of the most recent trends in the contest of business models analyses. A research Saas (software as a service)-infrastructures and applications in real scenarios (de Miranda, 2010) gives a profound review of the origins of the SaaS business model. Miranda says that the SaaS business model became a successor of the ASP (Application Service Provider) business model, which in its turn appeared to deliver software to a broader market share. As a new business model, the SaaS emerged to fix ASP's “disadvantages and covet its opportunities”.

As the author emphasized, in contrary to ASP, SaaS clients “don't have to buy the software solution and then pay the provider to host it, but rather just pay for the usage of the service”. Moreover, the clients get better assess the costs since the payment model is based on a monthly/annually fee. Another advanced feature described by Miranda is that SaaS provides makes stronger protection of intellectual property, which results can be seen in the cases of revenue stream or the proprietors of the software solutions.

One of the most significant articles for us focusing on SaaS phenomenon became an article Software as a Service (SaaS): An Enterprise Perspective written by the Microsoft Corporation's authors (Carraro G., Chong F., 2006) in the period when it was not yet trendy to study it. They addressed SaaS from the perspective of the enterprise consumer. The authors write that “SaaS application access is frequently sold using a subscription model, with customers paying an ongoing fee to use the application. Fee structures vary from application to application; some providers charge a flat rate for unlimited access to some or all of the application's features, while others charge varying rates that are based on usage”. That makes clearly reasonable for them that the subscription model in comparison to the one-time licensing model “is expected to take advantage of the benefits of centralization through a single-instance, multi-tenant architecture, and to provide a feature-rich experience competitive with comparable On-Premise applications”.

From the PwC report (PricewaterhouseCooper, 2007) where the key findings about the current software industry environment were provided it became well-defined that consumer behavior had changed a lot recently and that vendors now are reevaluating their software pricing and delivery models to accommodate this change. In this research prepared nine years ago there was also already noted a process of shifting from up-front paying to periodic payments. Nevertheless, it took a long time for this trend to become widely discussed and studied which resulted in high relevance of this issue in last two years among software vendors.

The most interesting part of the PwC report is the forecast given up to 2016. They predicted the spread of the SOA (service-oriented architecture) among both vendors and consumers: as for enterprise consumers, “it gives them full control over the value they leverage from their software”, meanwhile the vendors get an opportunity “to integrate their applications in real life for customers and other vendors”. All this forms “a stable service-delivery environment where customers have traded vendor subscriptions and infrastructure lock-in for true agility and customization”.

Referring to the book The Automatic Customer: Creating a Subscription Business in Any Industry (Warrillow J., 2015), the lifeblood of the business is repeat customers, or, how he is calling them in the book, automatic customers. According to John Warrillow, companies that know how to find and keep subscribers, get the huge opportunities offered by the emerging subscription economy. He claims and proves in his work that “automatic customers are the key to increasing cash flow, igniting growth, and boosting the value of your company”. The author shows that subscriptions are not limited to technology or media businesses. Companies in almost all the industries, from start-ups to the global corporations can implement subscriptions models into their business to gain more. Warrillow provides a breakdown of nine different types of subscription models for winning automatic customers and illustrates them all with instructive examples. His blueprint included the following:

1. Membership website model;

2. All you can eat library model;

3. Private club model;

4. Front of the line model;

5. The consumables model;

6. Surprise box model;

7. Simplifier model;

8. Network model;

9. Peace of mind model.

The ideas given in the book are universe and can be applied in any kind of industry. We used this list to specify subscription models which could be useful and profitable for SaaS businesses.

A big step in exploring the core difference of the subscription economy from the traditional one was made by the Anne Janzer in her book Subscription Marketing (Janzer, 2015). In this book she shared all her knowledge accelerated with more than 20 years of experience working with the high tech businesses. The main point described and explained by the author in this book is of a high significance for subscription marketing. She suggests a new label - value nurturing - to identify the process “of helping the customer realize value from your solution”. She shows that value nurturing is the fourth important level of relationships between a company and a customer. The traditional customer journey looks the following way: firstly, finding prospects (lead generation), secondly, convincing them of the potential value of the company's solution (lead nurturing) and then making the prospect a customer (conversion). Janzer adds that “the marketing responsibility extends beyond conversion to customer value nurturing”. This renewed attention on sustaining long-term relations with customers by bringing value nurturing to their experience instead of focusing on lead generation and conversion is the prime responsibility of the subscription-based companies who want to help customers make a smart economic decision.

Chapter 1. Market evolution

1.1 Transformation of business: shift to the subscription economy

Experts say that 2007 became a year when a new trend started spreading all over the world: that was so called “once-in-a-century transformation in the way business is transacted”. From that time on different companies have started offering an option of subscribing to services instead of just buying products. That first happened with the big companies like Amazing and Netflix, but soon other industries added such an option to their services. In PwC report (PricewaterhouseCooper, 2007) where the key findings about the current software industry environment are provided it becomes well-defined that consumer behavior has changed a lot recently and that vendors now are reevaluating their software pricing and delivery models to accommodate this change. In this research prepared nine years ago there was already noted such a trend as shifting from up-front paying to periodic payments. This trend now is considered to be the hallmark of the 21st century (Tzuo, The subscription economy: a business transformation, 2015).

It took a long time for businesses to make this shift from the product-centric pay-per-product transaction model to a model with the long-term relationships with recurring revenue happen. Experts say that this process started as a consequence of the wide spread of web 2.0 and the development of online platforms (Kaplan Andreas M. and Michael Haenlein, 2010).

Thus, in the Internet age a phenomenon of “people-to-people exchanges through technologies” appeared enabling a new kind of economy. That was a born of the sharing economy. It was a new and alternative socio-economic system where buying things was not already the only way to consume things.

In the research The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption (Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M.&Ukkonen, A, 2015) it is said that the sharing economy should be considered through the lens of information technologies since this phenomenon “emerges from a number of technological developments that have simplified sharing of both physical and nonphysical goods and services through the availability of various information systems on the Internet”.

The sharing economy offered entrepreneurs a wide range of business models based on the idea of availability of online platforms among which can be named such forms as collaborative consumption, wikinomics, peer-to-peer file sharing, open data, content sharing in social media, user generated content, subscriptions, crowd funding, crowdsourcing and etc. (Matofska, 2014). Later, the sharing economy term has become more specialized and the subscription based models have been allocated as a separate direction in the business landscape.

Indeed, subscriptions have been used for many years by some industries - for example, magazines and newspapers, mobile and internet operators, cable TV, fitness clubs, public service ad etc. But more recently, many other new kinds of unexpected industries have started participating in the subscription economy, offering diverse range of goods and services from cars to online software for a flat monthly or year fee (Lev-Ram, 2014).

The “subscription economy” is the term coined by Zuora, “a leading commerce, billing, and finance solution for subscription-based businesses” (Bastian, 2014). In 2007, CEO of Zuora Tien Tzuo and his partners Cheng Zou and K.V. Rao started to build and spread around fundamentals of a new business model which could be used by companies of any size. The idea was to make possible for companies to offer customers different services via subscriptions instead of making single transactions and selling separate products.

They noticed that markets across different industries are looking for new models of shipping products as an answer to the increased demand of clients to consume goods in a new way. A significant point of this new business model was focusing on consumers and value to them, making them a key player in this process instead of focusing on the product, or transaction, or value to the brands themselves, as it was in traditional business model. The sudden idea was to monetize long-term relationships by offering consumers flexible and personalized goods and services. Flexibility here is about allowing customers the adaptability to “either pay as they go, or pay per subscription monthly, or via a long-term contract” (Whitler, 2016). Personalization in its turn is giving individual package of service depending on the needs of a particular client.

Thus, they called this new business model “the subscription economy”. Inventing this phrase helped Zuora made a buzz in the most popular business magazines such as Forbes, Wall Street Journal, Tech Crunch, Fortune, BBC, Huffpost Business. Since the year 2013, there have appeared many publications explaining what the subscription economy is and why it is important to put attention on it (to name just few of them: Zuora Lands $50M From Next World, Paul Allen, Marc Benioff & More To Help Fuel The Rise Of The Subscription Economy by Rip Empson, Tech Crunch Sep 5, 2013; The rise of The Subscription Economy by Kyle Hutzler, Huffpost Business, Jan 08, 2014; It's a subscription economy, and you're just living in it by Michal Lev-Ram, Fortune, June 6, 2014; How The Subscription Economy Is Disrupting The Traditional Business Model by Kimberly A. Whitler, Forbes, Jan 17, 2016). Subsequently, the term took a root in business environment being acknowledged by many experts as a new trend in economy.

The experts' opinions which were provided in the articles and in the forums were mainly positive and supported the core idea of the subscription economy phenomenon. Robbie Kellman Baxter, author of The Membership Economy, claims: “Customers are saying, `I'm willing to sign up, set it and forget it in exchange for a value accrued to me on a regular basis”. He also emphasized that “It's a massive transformation that is changing the way organizations engage with their constituents,” (Guth, 2015) which can be translated as being a revolutionary shift in economy and not just a passing trend. Another opinion leader John Warrillow, author of The Automatic Customer agrees with Baxter stating that “It's a fundamental change in the way we think”, which he explains as being more attracted by the brands who advertise experiences, relationships and belonging rather than by usual sellers. He gives such a comparison: “It's a little bit more like a marriage, where the consumer commits and the supplier says, `I'm going to look out for you, watch your back, and treat you right'” (Guth, 2015).

Talking about the perspectives and reach of this trend, the market leaders said that “The subscription economy is ever-growing. It's hard to quantify how big the subscription economy actually is, however, it's clear that this is the direction that most every service provider is headed” and that “The subscription or membership economy is huge (Judson, 2015). And good news is its growing, look at services such as Dollar Shave Club, or Dollar Beard Club, or even digital subscriptions such as Netflix, or Spotify, these are all subscription services, it's the new way of doing business” (Taei, 2015).

To understand better, why a shift to the subscription economy is happening we should accept these two facts proposed in 2014 by Dave Frechette, Vice President of Worldwide Sales Strategy and Execution at Zuora (Bastian, 2014):

1. It comes to stay. Companies that once have changed their business model to the subscription model rarely convert back. There is no way back from this transformation which goes through all the economy;

2. Big corporations prefer this model for being predictable. It gives them more focused and certain forecasts of their revenue and profitability.

As it was said before, the main attention in the subscription economy is focused on the consumers and their needs. In other words, there would not happen such a shift in economy if consumers would not show a tendency to desire more control and influence over their relationships with brands, vendors and service providers. The overall internet access and tremendously fast spread of mobile devices and social networks made consumers being more involved into all kind of communication processes giving them immediate answers to all their requests and demands. They got accustomed to the idea receiving everything they want “here and now” and be also able to select characteristics and conditions of usage according to their personal preferences. Saying differently, there has appeared a new type of a customer who wants brands to serve him how, where and when he wants (Sloat, 2015).

Another big change in consumer behavior which inspired this shift in economy refers to the demand for new consumption models: in the report prepared by The Economist Intelligence Unit in 2014, “80 percent of customers are demanding new consumption models including subscribing, sharing, and leasing?--?anything except actually buying a product outright” (Tzuo, The subscription economy: a business transformation, 2015). As Saar Gillai, Senior VP and GM at HP noticed in this report, “Consumers are getting accustomed to pay-as-you-go models, and they like that flexibility. They can instantly get all the capabilities without paying up-front for the cap-ex, and they have better control over their spend”.

Thus, it is possible and obvious to conclude that the consumer behavior has changed. To sum up, here can be given the following explanations of this change provided by various experts:

1) Customers today, especially youngsters, have no strong division between their business and personal interests and so they expect their business relations being more personalized. They frequently consider brands as their “friends” with whom they can always negotiate about any deal and compromise their interests;

2) Customers want to have a permanent access to an extensive library of information, ideas, solutions and specific products. The new era of information dictates a rule to be always aware of the latest updates on the market and be able to use them when, where and how you want it. Access itself becomes more significant than asset (Guth, 2015);

3) Customers do not want to buy a product that can become quickly old-fashioned or dysfunctional. Instead of that, they prefer to be able to stop using a product as fast as it is not useful anymore. Such a behavior is based on a common idea of the “right now” need, which means that a product cannot be delivered later and it should come at the right moment to be “real-time experience with immediate fulfillment” (Sloat, 2015) to satisfy a spontaneous and transitory wish;

4) Choosing a solution whether for personal or business use, customers now expect to get some value in return for their choice. They believe it will save them money or make their lives easier, or, at least, will bring them fun (Janzer, 2015).

Reasons given above make brands and vendors take more care of earning customer loyalty by presenting on-going value and memorable services which were supposed to show clear understanding of customers' demands and readiness to maintain long-term relationships with every client.

To sum up, many experts from the business landscape commit an idea: companies that eager to be leaders in their industries, maintaining long-term relationships with their clients and getting financial, technology, market, and customer loyalty benefits from their relations, need to plan their participation in this transformation already now.

1.2 Subscription based economy model overview: characteristics and functions

Since we discovered the relevance of the subscription model and found out why the transformation from traditional transaction economy to subscription started to happen, it is necessary also to go deeper into exploring particular features of its elements to understand better how it works.

Subscription business model is a model where a customer gets an access to a product or service after paying a subscription price. That means that rather than selling individual products, companies are turning towards to delivering services repeatedly. This changes financial relationships completely and requiring a new management system.

The basis of the traditional product world is the distribution-centric revenue management with the one-time transaction business model where sales are straightforward (shipping a product and sending an invoice to a customer to pay it). Additionally, traditional product-centric approach is tightly connected with implementation of such tools as customer relationship management (CRM) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems “which support sales automation, customer service, inventory management, supply chains, and accounting” (Tzuo, The subscription economy: a business transformation, 2015). The problem is that these systems were not designed for subscription based businesses, and companies who want to turn their customers into subscribers should adopt new technologies and management approach to facilitate their transformation.

A new management approach in the subscription model is based on the recurring revenue management (RRM) system: invoices are generated daily, monthly, quarterly or annually (Warrillow J., 2014). Thanks to this system, companies get an opportunity to manage the entire subscriber lifecycle and measure recurring revenue and subscription metrics.

Subscription is focused on the individual experience which makes customer fulfillment variable: customers can request anytime changes in the service adding new users, more services, changing pricing plans, or simply canceling service. Flexibility of price and packaging is the main feature of subscription employed to satisfy any kind of users. Flexibility allows customers to receive a standard subscription agreement but use the product differently depending on their needs. Thereby, customer demand in the subscription business model is measured not only by purchase data but by usage data and purchase data together. Moreover, in the subscription economy, there are no limits in product availability: a customer can receive a product or service in that extent which is preferable for him. Thus, “differentiated value and revenue opportunities have to be created by providing differentiated product packaging (e.g., different combinations of minutes, text, and data in a cellular plan)” (Shanahan, n.d.). As a result, inventory management is replaced with the rate plan management to optimize revenue.

This scenario goes beyond the systems designed for one-time transaction models. That is why revenue management system should be replaced with the recurring revenue management system which can better handle the complexities and growing needs of the subscription based businesses.

Chapter 2. Subscription Models applied in SaaS businesses

2.1 SaaS Subscription model: key features, market drivers and deterrents

In this paper we will not cover technical details which differentiate SaaS concept from other cloud computing services such as IaaS and PaaS (the basic structure of the clod computing is given the Application 1). The focus of this paper is to explore common features which attract customers to understand how SaaS changes users' life. This clear idea will help us consequently find advantages of SaaS subscription model and, as a result, frame particular strategies of attracting customers and turning them into subscribers. But before that, the first step should be researching SaaS as a subscription model.

Software-as-a-service (SaaS) phenomenon appeared in late 1990's when companies started offering traditional enterprise solutions such as customer relationship management (CRM), sales force automation (SFA), and Web content management through a SaaS model. But the idea of shared resource environment and cloud computing was already formulated in 1960's by a renowned computer scientist John McCarthy who won the Turing award for his work in Artificial Intelligence. In 1961, in his speech to MIT students he claimed that “computation may some day be organized as a public utility.” Yet this model was first implemented more than fifteen years ago, it has become a part of the business vernacular just over the past few years when “SaaS companies have proven they are able to grow their revenue and customer base through a subscription licensing model” (Singleton, 2011).

The common definition of Software as a Service (SaaS) is “a way of distributing software in which vendors or service providers, instead of selling it to companies, make it available to customers over the internet, using cloud-computing technology” (Singleton, 2011). It represents a software distribution model which, in contrast to an On-Premise deployment model, democratizes the access to software. The crucial characteristic of SaaS is hosting applications on provider's service instead of storing data on users' machines which gives an access to software from any computer connected to the internet.

Additionally to allowing remote access to the software applications and data via the web, SaaS also varies from On-Premise software in its pricing model. Typically, On-Premise software is available by purchasing a perpetual license and also requires additional fees (15%- 20% per year) to maintain and support it. Any update versions also cost high additional fees. In SaaS subscription model, users do not need to buy license to use the application, install its whole complex infrastructure and then pay ongoing operating and maintenance to support it and keep it updated. As an alternative, SaaS vendors offer to “rent” a software for a period of time and get a complex support and automatic updates included in their rental price (Patterson, 2010), in other words, buyers pay an annual or monthly subscription fee which is comfortably spread over time. For more detailed comparison of the economics of SaaS versus Licensed Software revenue models it can be interesting to look through the article SaaS Revenue Models Win in the Long Run (Key, 2013).

There are two types of SaaS which are business software and consumer software. The most popular SaaS examples are solutions for improving workflow with greater efficiency: these are various project management systems, task organizers, collaboration tools, document management platforms. They help organize individuals' and teams' shared and personal projects and tasks, give them a space for collective distant activity. Besides, such platforms are supposed to help planning time and resources for multiple projects and users. The target audience of these solutions is very diverse; they attract all kind of people with big work routine. This can be freelancers, representatives of all size businesses including startups, public administrations, student project groups.

Another pull of SaaS platforms consists of more specified solutions for particular industries and related activities. Here can be named applications for such spheres as finance and accounting, CRM, business information and analytics, human resources, marketing, operations, sales, communication and others.

SaaS features which make impact on both business and personal customer performance are based on the general advantages of cloud services. They are the following positive attributes:

1. Simplicity of adoption

SaaS solutions offer powerful fast integration of all necessary services within one modern platform that leverages secure, reliable and high performance database and middleware technologies which reduce technology difficulty of installation full in-house solution. The main mission of SaaS solutions is to make it easier to accomplish tasks and help optimize business processes. SaaS products mainly have drag-and-drop functions, intuitive interface and simple visuals. They do not require as necessity coding knowledge (it can be an additional option for advanced users) and IT-background (Patterson, 2010).

2. Price

High popularity of SaaS solutions is also boosted by its implementation cost. Buying a fully functional in-house system is not always affordable for companies, especially, for small and medium businesses and private users. SaaS subscription model with differentiated packages makes it more cost-effective to acquire the application. Besides, “reduced total cost of ownership is the primary and most attractive benefit driving SaaS adoption. SaaS vendors have long touted the benefits of multitenancy, a software architecture that allows many users to share a single application instance while retaining their own separate information. Multitenancy cuts costs by allowing vendors to patch and update the software for many users simultaneously and allowing many users to share the underlying infrastructure” (Kari, 2014).

3. Backup

SaaS platforms reduce the possibility of losing data in case of sudden emergencies such as ordinary computer system crash or less common nature disaster and civil disorder. Computer itself does not mean much as all data are backed up by the provider whose server plays a role of buffer in any unpredictable situation. That is an important issue proved by different researches: “According to research by KPMG, 70 percent of organizations have suffered at least one project failure in the prior 12 months, and 50 percent of respondents indicated that their project failed to consistently achieve what they set out to achieve” (Oracle, 2013).

4. Access to latest features

The cloud services open the door for latest functionality and improved security, usability, patches and bug fixes. Continues updates are sent as soon as they are ready to consumers and it's all done in the background, transparent to the users in your organization. These upgrades add value to consumer experience as they develop application ecosystem and give users new ways to collaborate and share information.

5. Flexible customization

Today, an integral part of being competitive in business is to be able to deal with changes easily. This flexibility requires new features and functionality for applications, for instance, adding new users to an application dashboard, upgrading original deployment with additional modules or components, or adopting entirely a new application. In SaaS platforms it is easy to manage such particular changes without concerns about changing whole infrastructure.

6. Multi-tenancy

SaaS model allows the cloud services providers (CSPs) to locate a single application instance to one tenant (to one client, despite of its size) with retaining own separate information of each user rather than putting out single instances to every individual user. “Multitenancy cuts costs by allowing vendors to patch and update the software for many users simultaneously and allowing many users to share the underlying infrastructure” (Kari, 2014), which is attractive to companies with limited financial resources.

7. SaaS Help Desk Solutions

Furthermore, most of the SaaS subscriptions include customer support which means getting immediate help of the professional team in any problem situation. Customer Support service tracks and responds to all the customer inquiries from multiple-channels like online community forums, phone, email online consultancy, webinars, tutorials, and social media. The advanced features of SaaS Help Desk Solutions are opportunity to find answers without anybody's help at Self-service or knowledge base portal and integration with other applications (like Google Analytic or social media) (Jadhav, 2016).

8. Mobile access

Growing popularity of mobile devices made vendors expanded beyond desktop-only access and began providing mobile SaaS apps that could be accessed from smartphones, tablets or any other device with a browser. All data in both desktop and mobile systems is typically auto-synced, which helps run business from any place and any device with the internet access (Viswanathan, 2015).

To conclude, SaaS solutions priced on a subscription basis demonstrates a number of strong advantages over traditional, On-Premise software deployments. For both business and personal purposes, SaaS applications deliver modern functionality and up-to-date capabilities that can satisfy any budget. Attractive affordability and the familiarity of the web browser-like user interface (UI) offered by SaaS solutions makes it more convenient for costumers to run their businesses.

Nevertheless, there also exist strong deterrents for distribution of cloud services and SaaS particularly. The major challenge which SaaS developers face today is identity management and access control for enterprise applications. Another point under contradictory debates among users is the information security. Many companies who have never worked with clouds are afraid to store their projects and client bases on the outsource servers because of fear of violating private data. In their view, their own IT departments which protect bases are more reliable than any other sided provider.

But indeed, the security and privacy of data is a more developed point that ordinary consumers think. This moment is not technical but psychological. There exist various technologies to expand the role-based access to the cloud, for example through a single access (single sign-on, SSO) technology. Nowadays, the leading SaaS solutions provide multi-tiered security clearance which makes keeping sensitive data completely safe (Singleton, 2011).

Currently, each of the big players in the SaaS market tends to create its own technology of relationship with the client to assure them in safety of data storage. For instance, Google has a Secure Data Connector which creates an encrypted connection between customer data and Google business applications and allows a client to control which employees can access to Google Apps resources and which cannot. CRM Salesforce provides similar functionality based on its own technology.

There exists a comprehensive standard ISO 27001 which describes many aspects of information security which can be confusing for customers. There is also another standard ISO 27002 which can be interesting for service providers and customers which describes the practical information security management. This standard can be used in constructing the SaaS cloud, but in any case it is necessary to develop specific standards for cloud computing.

Another drawback of storing data in the SaaS platform is its just online availability. It makes users depended on the Internet and, in case of loss of access to the Internet, they lose access to their data in SaaS applications.

One more problem that SaaS vendors face is that there are users who are not ready to pay for software if they know how to get this software illegally for free. But experts say that if the price corresponds to the 'painless' level, then users will probably not use illegal tools like registration code generator or wares (note: wares are software programs distributed illegally with copyright violation). But SaaS subscription model in contrast to On-Premise reduce possibility to get a software illegally as an access to personal online account can be received just after paying subscription fee.

Thus, taking into account all the concerns related to SaaS solutions, that consumers have, SaaS developers should strive for a high level of transparency of their services. They should give users a feeling of totally safe and reliable storage of their data. The ideal model would be giving options of aptitude install or export of all infrastructure and repository of data created with this software. Moreover, the price should be set at the reasonable level as the main concern for most of users when they choose SaaS platform is to get more for a less price.

2.2 SaaS in Russia: trends, problems and opportunities

In the overview Cloud services in 2015 (CNews Analytics, 2015) a detailed investigation of the recent trends on Russian IT market is conducted. In the current part of our research we will use this overview as a reference to study trends and problems which SaaS phenomenon face in Russia nowadays. This will help us evaluate the potential significance and opportunities of SaaS solutions for the Russian customers.

The first big Russian cloud computing projects were launched in 2009. During 2011-2012, the development of the SaaS solutions by Russian companies was targeted mainly on small and medium business. In 2013, there were about 25 SaaS solutions prepared by Russian providers, and the main part of them were projects adapted to the SaaS subscription model from the traditional software model (PMR, 2015).

But recently, the situation on the SaaS market in Russian has started improving a lot. Experts from Paralleles estimate that during the last few years the share of SaaS in the cloud solutions sales in Russia reached about 70% and in the segment of small and medium businesses almost 90%. According to the experts from Russian Cloud Computing Professional Association, the Russian SaaS market consists of nearly 200 high-quality complex services for business users, whereas less than 30 young and ambitious IT companies set trends in this sphere. Most of them are not even placed among top-100 of the largest domestic IT companies but they successfully compete with the world's leading producers of IT solutions (CNews Analytic, 2015).

Another analysis provided by iKS-Consulting estimates the pace of growth of SaaS market to be around 25% in 2015-2018. The SaaS market is growing despite the fact that the Russian IT industry is generally stagnating. According to CNews100 rating (2014), the total revenue of 100 largest Russian IT companies increased slightly (+ 1%) in RUB, but decreased by 15% in dollar terms. The figures published by iKS-Consulting demonstrate also the proceeds from the cloud technologies in Russia increased by 35% in 2014 comparing to the previous year. The biggest part of this cloud revenue belongs to SaaS and makes up to 89% (the IaaS share is 9%, PaaS - 2%) (Lebedev, 2015).

Speaking about economic situation in Russia, Olivier Caisson, commercial director of Orange Business Services in Russia and CIS explains in his interview to CNews why crisis provokes the increase of cloud solutions such as SaaS (as well as PaaS, IaaS and others). In the crises time characterized by uncertainty, businesses need maximum flexibility which can be achieved by using cloud infrastructures. Another cloud trend on the Russian market announced by Caisson is improving law regulation for personal data storage which stimulates the development of local cloud market. Moreover, the Russian market has enormous growth opportunities since for many customers cloud applications are not yet an obvious solution. Comparing to Western Europe, the level of outsourced managed services is still lower in Russia. But, referring to his words, the situation is changing, and the number of companies that are interested in transferring their resources to the cloud and shifting to the outsourcing model is growing. Nevertheless, this process is still not wide-spread and this approach to market strategy planning is not common (CNews, 2015).

Ilya Bublik, Head of Corporate Business Automatization Department at SKB Kontur, thinks that combinations of software and services will be widely discussed and popular: “Cloud services are expanding and will go further. Exponential or close to it growth was shown by MoeDelo, MoiSklad, bitrix24, amoCRM, Kontur.Bughalteria, Kontur.Elba, Kontur.Diadok etc. I want to specify that this growth is not directly due to the current environment: rub's depreciation and import phase-out. Cloud solutions are more convenient for small business in comparison with desktop solutions, as they provide an access to the app from any spot in the world and from any platforms - smartphone, tablet or stationary PC. Besides, cloud solutions provide a lot of other, “unseen” for client, necessary things: data safety, output capacity etc. In fact, the only thing that prevents the distribution of the cloud - some kind of inertia of thinking” (Consulting, J'son & Partners, 2015).

Another expert, a representative of Mango Telecom Alexey Bessarabsky also admits the fact of migration companies to SaaS as it allows them optimize costs, which is of high significance in crisis. 'In crisis due the weakness of the national currency, sanctions and other difficulties it is less available to buy complex IT solutions which also stimulates the transition to the cloud-based solutions. Thus, the crisis encourages companies to move to SaaS-model” (Lebedev, 2015).

There is a strong opinion that SaaS applications are more suitable for small and medium businesses and private users. But some experts assure that large companies are willing even more to update their business processes with “fashionable” solutions as they understand what benefits are obtained when working with automation systems. That is why SaaS systems which give the opportunity to add extra functionality to the existing infrastructure look attractive for them. The problem is that big business is used to work with large suppliers, but both of categories - big clients and big suppliers - frequently are hostages of old corporate infrastructures and run bulky technologies which are heavily invested and, thus, difficult to replace. While big companies still utilize “heavy”, expensive traditional infrastructures, the global trend of module infrastructure becomes more obvious for the “young” part of Russian IT community. In opinion of Sergey Sobin, a head of the Workaud project, 'the paradigm of IT-technologies is changing'. Rodion Repin, Managing Partner of Million Agents agrees that “time of 'ponderous' decision-making has passed; the world is moving towards more specific and easier solutions'. Turnkey SaaS solutions attract consumers with its in-depth knowledge of business processes. Acquaintance with variety of services that developers offer can become a source of business optimization ideas for a potential customer (CNews Analytic, 2015).

So, young and creative SaaS developers who offer easy turnkey solutions based on deep understanding of modern business processes get more competitive advantages in winning big companies attention. Besides, young companies who chose SaaS technology as a prime service from the very beginning do not carry “burden of the past” and so do not need to rebuild their business models. They spend more time to learn and develop their best solutions.

At the same time, big IT companies who are turning now to SaaS subscription model have another advantage: they use their well-established reputation and client base to shift their software solutions from the On-Premise model to the subscription one. Commercial Director of 'IT Grad' Stanislav Mril, whose company is rated among TOP 25 largest SaaS providers in Russia in 2015 points out that the most profitable strategy is to sell SaaS-products from well-known brands, which have already proven their efficiency as On-Premise software solutions: 'A truly explosive growth in SaaS deals comes from selling services which are highly demanded as the 'box' versions of the software products of leading players in the business market (Microsoft, 1C, CommVault, ServiceNow, etc.)' (Lebedev, 2015).

According to the ranking of the largest SaaS providers in Russia in 2015 conducted by CNews Analytics (Application 2), due to the peculiarities of Russian legislation one of the most demanded segments in SaaS is Tax Accounting Services (SKB Kontur took the first place with the reported revenue of 5.5 billion RUB). Among the leaders of SaaS solutions there are also services of electronic trading, which do not have their foreign counterparts (B2B company Center, which is engaged in the development of the electronic trading service, won the third place in ranking with 1,16 billion RUB revenue). The rest of the structure of SaaS the Russian market follows the trends of the global market, where the greatest demand is demonstrated for the customer relationships management systems (CRM). Among CRM products in the ranking there are presented Western leading systems by such brands as Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, as well as the solutions of the domestic companies (1C, Megaplan, amoCRM). Another popular segment in the domestic SaaS market are communication and collaboration platforms, particularly, the Cloud Private Branch Exchange (PBX). There are two vendors in CNews SaaS ranking working in this field: they are Mango Telecom with revenue of 1.35 billion RUB (2nd place) and Telphin (318 million RUB, 7th place). 'Now, a significant share of SaaS solutions belongs to the Tax Accounting Services. But experts also predict fast development of cloud-based solutions for remote collaboration and communication. The main factors contributing to this growth are the dynamic implementation of mobile devices, new formats of business with increasing amount of distant working employees, the need to take quick decisions and, as a result, real-time access to information from anywhere in the world”, says CEO of Telphin Marina Turina (Lebedev, 2015). The ranked members showed different dynamics of revenue. The turnover of the five participants has increased more than twice: amoCRM (+ 193%), Cloud4Y (+ 124%), 'IT Grad' (+ 114%), 'Business Projects' (+ 109%), 'CIT Region' (+ 105%).

Project leader of Qsoft (amoCRM) Mikhail Tokovkin connects revenue growth with successful positioning in the rapidly growing niche: 'Although CRM systems have already been around for a long time, many companies realize the value of working with leads and customer base just now. amoCRM is very precisely focused on this need and offers a simple and convenient solution'.

A specialist of Cloud4y company Eugene Bessonov links the success of his company with a crisis and with the ability to adjust to the demands of the market at the right moment: 'The reasons of the interest can be, firstly, the reduction of IT budgets, which cloud services are able to manage with, and, secondly, the desire to reduce the risks of 'idle' equipment. In addition, the expansion of our business proposal up to 20 cloud services helped attract new customers and increase an average invoice of old clients'.

Talking about small and medium business that often does not have capacity to deploy their own infrastructure, it seems logical that SaaS is the best solution for them. But SaaS developers note that small and medium business is a difficult audience. On the one hand, the current economic situation is challenging for small and medium companies. 'In a crisis, entrepreneurs are not confident in the future, the ability to manage without great investments in IT infrastructure is especially attractive', says Sergey Maksimenko, CEO of GC 'System Technology'. The limited budgets and the need for fast and powerful solutions make SaaS technology a natural remedy for those who look for speed and flexibility. SaaS applications are available at a price, they can be quickly installed and connected, and they address specific business problems and give immediate tangible results. Consumers may not have their own IT professionals, and, actually, they do not need it. All expenses are included into subscription price. But on the other hand, there is still not enough knowledge, a basic understanding how to use the solution, how simple and accessible it is.

However, over the past few years, small and medium business has made a big step forward. In the research Global and Russian SaaS-Solutions Markets in B2B Segment (Consulting, J'son & Partners, 2015) there was made a forecast that “Russian SaaS market in the small business segment will reach 28 bln RUB by 2016. Currently, the growth rates of SaaS market overstep the global rates, according to the estimations of different analytical agencies” (Application 3).

Consumers are changing their attitudes and suppliers, in their turn, are trying to optimize their proposals for small companies' needs. Thus, for instance, amoCRM company offers CRM package for small businesses for about 5000 RUB per month; for single users, it is possible “to get a place in the cloud” in the accounting application for 500 RUB per month. The increased activity of small businesses helps develop the technology. 'Small and medium business is more demanding: the service as well as the interface is very carefully evaluated, and the feedback comes back quickly', Sergey Maksimenko says. Developers have to prepare high-quality, understandable solutions so that all kind of unexperienced users could implement them in their business processes.

Currently, Russian SaaS providers sometimes still offer two different options of payment for their software products. One of them is a traditional single payment for On-Premise deployment with perpetual rights over software and another one is a subscription model requiring recurring payments. This tendency demonstrates the fact that not all the consumers yet are ready to use subscription as the only way of acquiring software (excluding solutions which were designed as subscriptions from the very beginning). In contrast, foreign SaaS providers commonly employ just only the subscription model, even if their product was delivered On-Premise in the past (like it was with Adobe, Microsoft Office, SAP, Autodesk). Adobe can be the brightest example of a company who made this shift not without difficulties connected with changing consumers thinking about subscriptions. In 2011 the company announced its intention to shift from being a company that sells software to one that rents it out. For the next three years, the reaction of their clients was more than furious: from $833 million in revenue in 2011 the company dropped down to $268 million in 2014. Even while they were continuing to fall in their earnings, in 2013 Adobe announced that there would be no newer releases of its perpetual Creative Suite. But over the few next years their income finally has started growing again, and to end 2015 they expected to come with $3 billion in annual recurring revenue and with approximately 5.9 million subscribers. But the point of success of this story was value nurturing - giving consumers not the same product but under different payment model but bringing value to their new experience: “The key was not just transforming the price and how people paid us. We needed a product that was materially different, a whole new product”, admitted Mark Garrett, Adobe's CFO (McCann, 2015).

This example shows that subscription is not always the customer's preferred model. For many customers the traditional license model is still relevant, and in spite of the increasing popularity of the subscription approaches it will continue to be so especially when speaking about such developing markets as the Russian one.

Summing up, it is possible to claim that SaaS market is the largest segment on the cloud services market in general, and the interest to use such type of cloud solutions is constantly increasing in Russia due to the opportunity to reduce the capital costs by replacing them on operational. One of the central factor that can deter the choice of SaaS is mistrust to information security of stored data connected with inertia of thinking rather than with real situation.

2.3 Predicted impact of SaaS subscription model on the Russian business landscape

New digital solutions expansion over the globe is a fast developing trend and SaaS is believed to be a driving force behind this digitalization. We use SaaS far more often than we think. SaaS solutions are all around persistently convincing us in their convenience, simplicity and efficiency. As SaaS Addict writer Omri Erel says, “SaaS will be everything and everywhere, in a way that allows us to share information, intelligence, insights and opinions at all times.” (Harvey, 2016)

The intimacy between SaaS companies and their customers has increased after the fast rise of the subscription economy. The subscription economy turns relationships of companies with customers into more direct, responsive, complex and multi-channel. Customers become certainly a key part of this relationships and companies rather than spotlighting product itself or transaction as a central point of their business, should live with the idea how bring value to customers. The main focus in the formula for growth should be on monetizing long-term relationships instead of shipping products.

Accepting all above as a fundamental base of the SaaS subscription model, we can consider the impact of SaaS on Russian business landscape from two perspectives: this can be impact on companies who are clients of SaaS providers, and on SaaS providers as they are representatives of business landscape as well.

Thus, the predictable consequences of wide use of SaaS solutions can lead to a scenario where companies become more focused on their own business specialization and so the efficiency of their work increases as more time is dedicated to specific business tasks. This common productivity grow will healthfully influence Russian economy in general bringing more professional services in all kind of industries.

Besides, SMB companies which do not have enough industrial resources and finances to complete different tasks not predominant for their business, putting a part of their responsibility on SaaS providers, finally, get equal opportunities on the market to become competitively attractive in their niche as they use help of professionals with huge experience when working on their projects.

Looking from a SaaS companies' perspective, the possible impact of implementing the SaaS subscription model into their business is vastly big. First of all, as it was reported in the various researches used in our paper, the pace of growth of Russian SaaS market is increasing and estimated to be around 25% in 2015-2018 despite the fact that Russian IT industry is suffering from crises. That means that SaaS solutions will only grow in their attractiveness gaining the biggest share among cloud services and becoming highly popular than ever before. One of the reason of this rapid grow can be “fast” channels of communication which are indispensable part of the subscription model. Being so close to clients feedback motivates providers to develop and update their software quicker, better and further in order to keep their customers satisfied and renewing their subscriptions. This positive influence of new communication standards which force providers improve their services encourages high-speed progress of Russian SaaS market in general.

Secondly, SaaS companies worldwide, and particularly in Russia, are gaining reputation of an expert community: their experience is based on countless cases of improving business efficiency, they conduct diverse researches and collect extensive library of analytic data which help them provide better solutions for businesses of any industry. Moreover, they use these analytics not just to develop their own solutions, but also to share their wide experience with their audience in their blogs, forums, webinars. Some SaaS companies offer educational courses prepared by their experts, arrange presentations and workshops for partner universities and business organizations. Partly, it is a result of the value nurturing approach which suggests that clients do not want just to get a product, they want to get some value when they acquire this product, and new knowledge is a kind of universal value which SaaS companies bring to society (Janzer, 2015). Thus, SaaS companies can be considered as a source of highly useful information with their reliable data and practical tips.

A possible negative consequence of the universal penetration of SaaS subscription applications to solve business tasks is about reaching the saturation point when there will be too many online subscriptions which will be hard to manage. But in Russia the trend of applying SaaS solutions into business workflow is just rising and it is too early to anticipate this downturn.

Chapter 3. Real scenarios of SaaS infrastructures and applications

3.1 SaaS Subscription businesses: comparison of foreign and Russian cases

Now, since the basic principles and key features of the SaaS subscription models are explored, and strong and weak sides of this phenomenon in the contest of the Russian business landscape are found out, the empirical study of the real SaaS infrastructures and applications scenarios should be conducted to approbate the theoretical theses of this research.

In the empirical part of the paper we use the case study method to provide a three-stage research. This method is applied to reconstruct the cases of implementation the SaaS subscription model in Russian and foreign software companies by collecting detailed descriptive data qualitative in nature.

The flow of the case study

First stage. Preparation

In the first part of the research, we made a choice of 16 SaaS applications based on the following restrictions:

1) The selection includes 8 Russian SaaS applications with the subscription business model;

2) The selection includes 8 foreign SaaS applications with the subscription business model;

3) The selection is random and includes applications by companies of different size, degree of popularity, and market share;

4) The selection is restricted with the applications with corporate clients which employ these solutions for business purposes (B2B segmentation);

5) The chosen applications have 3 and more reviews each published in the leading business software review platforms.

For this purpose, we used the next leading business software review platforms:

1) G2Growd - “the world's leading business software review platform, leveraging its 70,000+ user reviews read by nearly 600,000 software buyers” (G2Growd);

2) GetApp - “the leading premium business app discovery platform on the web. The site focuses on profiling established business apps -- mostly software as a service (SaaS) -- targeting an audience of small and medium-sized businesses and business buyers from enterprise departments” (Nubera);

3) StartPack - “Comparison system for cloud services performance and reviews, which helps find cloud integrators with specified criteria” (StartPack).

As a result, we pointed out the next companies for our case study:

Russian applications

Foreign applications

Solution

Category

Solution

Category

Kontur Elba

Accounting

Xero

Accounting

CRM Simple business

Business management system

Zoho CRM

Business management system

Megaplan

Business management system

Basecamp

Business management system

Bitrix24

Collaboration&Productivity

Wrike

Collaboration&Productivity

Worksection

Collaboration&Productivity

Evernote

Content&Document managemnt

Mango Office

Business communications

Aircall

Business communications

PlanFix

Temwork management

Microsoft Office 365

Office suits

amoCRM

CRM and transactions system

Adobe Creative Cloud

Digital media

The next step of the research was to define characteristics relying on which we could collect qualitative data and describe the chosen solutions within unified systematic approach. With this aim, we have compiled a set of features that illustrated the applications from the communication perspective: these features represented how applications involve clients into communication processes, how they support relations, which channels of communication they take advantage of and others. These set of features was based on the deep analysis of the reviews left by clients on the G2Growd, GetApp and StartPack review platforms. We observed a vast range of both positive and negative feedback (Application 5) and selected the points of view related to the issue and of the highest concern for clients. Consequently, there was designed the following original worksheet:

1) SaaS Solution;

2) Category;

3) Business model;

4) Key idea;

5) Landing Page (Official Site):

· Simplicity;

· Usability;

· Utility;

6) Call to action button;

7) Service Features;

8) Promotions;

9) Compliance with law;

10) Security and privacy;

11) Data backup;

12) Team support: communication channels;

13) Social accounts;

14) Help Desk;

15) Partnership programs;

16) Online payment;

17) Mobile app;

18) Integration with popular cloud services and applications;

19) User interface;

20) Installation and customization;

21) Crossplatform solution;

22) Trial access;

23) Free access with limited options;

24) Gamification;

25) Additional extensions (applications);

26) English language;

27) Company ideology.

All companies' profiles are available at Application 4

Second Stage. Trends analysis

The main aim of the second stage of our research was to analyze gathered data and pick out the most significant trends. To assist this process, we introduced measurement scales for each feature and counted quantitative data where it was possible. All the information was examined from three dimensions: they are “Russian cases”, “Foreign cases” and “Total”.

First, we examined the clients' feedback from the leading business software review platforms (G2Growd, GetApp, StartPack). As a result, the following trends were differentiated:

1) Clients put high expectation on the Customer Support service of the SaaS applications: the most appreciated characteristics are quick expert help, efficiency of responds and client oriented individual approach;

2) Clients value the service security;

3) Clients want applications being easy to understand, to install and customize;

4) Correct ideology earns big attention;

5) Convenience of an application should go along with simplicity and wide set of features;

6) Design of application matters as well as intuitive operation interface;

7) Mobile version is a strongly desirable option;

8) Regular updates should happen regularly but without disturbing clients from business workflow;

9) An application is expected to be flexible to fit any needs;

10) Clients read corporate blogs and Knowledge Base of SaaS providers looking for educational tips how to operate the system;

11) The product is expected to be cost-effective;

12) Clients value most of all that applications make their life easier and more professional, and help bring a team together.

13) Clients want their applications being integrated with many other useful cloud solutions;

14) The idea of paying a monthly cost and always having the most up-to-date software as opposed to paying a large up seems attractive to most of users.

As we can see, the trends above prove the theoretical aspects of SaaS subscription model covered in our research in the Chapter 2.

Secondly, we studied the data from companies' worksheets designed at the first stage of our research and pulled out the next tendencies which companies demonstrate:

1) Foreign companies typically stop employing On-Premise model for selling their solutions, using the subscription model as the only way to deliver their SaaS solutions; in contrast, one third of the Russian software companies are still using On-Premise strategy together with the subscription model (Application 6, table 1);

2) Among Russian companies it is typical to use monthly subscription model whereas foreign companies offer their clients both monthly and annual subscription plans (Application 6, table 2);

3) Foreign SaaS providers put more attention on making their sites both simple and useful for their clients: all the indicators - usability, simplicity, utility - gained more scores comparing to the same parameters of the sites of the Russian providers, yet not much more (Application 6, table 3);

4) Among top-5 most useable means of communication of the Customer Support service with clients can me listed such options (from the most popular to the less one) as email support, blog, online consultancy, phone support, and user community help (Application 6, table 4);

5) All the companies - both Russian and foreign - have Help Desk service in their platforms to educate their clients and share knowledge. They most common educational formats (from the most popular to the less one) are videos / demo tours, FAQ-tutorial, webinars, knowledge base and user's guideline. Foreign companies include into their Help Desk more often knowledge base and video, comparing to Russian companies whereas Russian SaaS providers more frequently offer training courses, workshops and webinars (Application 6, table 5);

6) Analyzing social activity of the companies, it can be noticed that all the companies are active enough in social media; Russian companies usually use 3-4 social accounts, foreign companies - 5-6 accounts. Absolutely popular social net among companies is Facebook. Foreign providers also use much LinkedIn, Twitter and Youtube, the Russian - Vkontakte, Twitter and Youtube (Application 6, tables 6, 7);

7) Most of the SaaS companies have partnership programs (Application 6, table 8);

8) Several features tend to absolute expression: all the companies are integrated with online payment systems, are compliant with law, have privacy policy and use HTTPS protocol, multifactor authentication and automatic backup at several servers to secure and protect data (Application 6, tables 9,10);

9) All the foreign providers offer mobile version of their solutions while more than half of Russian companies still do not have such option (Application 6, table 11);

10) The majority of the SaaS providers have user-friendly interface (Application 6, table 12);

11) It is more typical for Russian SaaS companies to offer promotions to stimulate clients to subscribe than for foreign providers (Application 6, table 13);

12) The majority of the SaaS providers have simple installation and customization (Application 6, table 14);

13) SaaS providers more commonly offer 30-day trial access with (Application 6, table 15);

14) Free access with limited options is more typical for Russian companies rather than for foreign providers (Application 6, table 16);

15) The majority of the SaaS providers do not use gamification inside their applications (Application 6, table 17);

16) The majority of the SaaS providers have additional extensions and applications compatible to integrate with their solutions (Application 6, table 18);

17) Only half of Russian SaaS solutions have English version of their platform (Application 6, table 19);

18) All the examined foreign companies have strong corporate ideology comparing with less than a half of Russian companies which have it (Application 6, table 20).

Summing up all the discovered trends, we can make the resulting conclusions:

3.2 Success strategies to attract and retain subscribers

What is customer success? Many sellers stop after completing customer acquisition, but this is just the beginning of the whole process. Our strong belief based on the results of the conducted research is that attracting customers and turning them into subscribers is a complex strategy involving many fundamental insights. Finding and applying these insights into business can improve business efficiency and bring more value to customer experience.

According to our new combined database and defined trends, as well as using theoretical background of this paper, we can suggest our own strategies for SaaS subscription based companies which are intended to help attract and retain customers, turning them into subscribers.

Thus, the following 5 strategies will be the beginning of creating long-term relations with customers in the SaaS subscription based business. These strategies reflect the main philosophy of the SaaS subscription industry that we can also formulate now after conducting the research:

“Subscription is about giving, not about taking. To make people subscribe, SaaS solution should give clients a feeling that they will pay less and earn.To make people stay for a long time, SaaS solution should become a source of endless value which could not be measured by money.”

Hence, here are the strategies:

1. Found your business on correct ideology

All foreign cases studied in this paper demonstrated a high level of corporate ideology which also gained a big appreciation among their clients. Customers are more interested in communicating with a company which does not insist on purchase but offer to give its service a try to see how it can change your life. With this aim a trial option and free access with limited options should be offered to clients so that they could decide before subscribing weather you are really a solution of their problems. Correct ideology also includes educational aspect which was coverd above.

2. Support your customers

One of the most urge problems faced while examening Russian SaaS providers was a lack of customer support. The most negative feedback gathered from Russian users concerns inefficient and slow responds. We suggest that each SaaS company needs to have its own Customer Support service with at least 5 channels of communication so that users could easily approach a support team. This can be email support, blog, online consultancy, phone support, and user community help. Besides, staying in touch with customers in social media is highly demanded: this is the shortest way to share your professional help and experience. A huge attention should be put on educating consultants to make their service professional and reliable. Support should go beyond data and empathizing with the situation your customers are in. This also includes keeping an eye on feedback and responding to complaints to show customers that you listen to them and are eager to help.

3. Become an expert and educate your customers

New practical knowledge is a kind of universal value that people appreciate a lot, especially, if it helps improve their life. SaaS providers who offer vast libraries of useful information attract attention of their potential clients which can become subscribers if they value this particular SaaS company as a source of reliable information. For this aim, the most popular educational formats - such as video, knowledge base, webinars, workshops - can be employed.

4. Constantly widen your business proposal

Customers are looking for simple solutions of their complicated problems. SaaS applications which can combine both being simple and have wide set of useful features are on their way to success. It means not only upgrading an application with various features, but be able to offer new extensions and solutions within interest of your target audience. Once clients used and liked your application, they will be more loyal to try new solution.

5. Do not be afraid to work with big clients though you are a small SaaS provider

In our case study companies of different size participated and as we found out, their efficiency and attractiveness for clients was not defined by their status, reputation and size. People put attention on more specific features when evaluating their experience which help them improve their life. Moreover, big companies appreciate flexibility of small providers, their more individual approach to solve particular problems and smaller price. If your company can bring value to their business and, with that, cut their costs, then big clients will be more than willing to stay your subscriber.

There are plenty of other insights on managing customer success, but these five strategies are fundamental to build long-term relations with clients.

software subscription service business market

Conclusion

SaaS subscription model is a perspective field for Russian business landscape. It offers a lot of opportunities for both customers and SaaS providers as we saw in our research. We proved that subscription model is a phenomenon of increasing demand in Russia connected with a specific economic situation in our country. We picked out multitude advantages of this model, and in a conclusion, we can say that our hypothesis was proved. The subscription model, applied in a software company, really suits better clients' needs, especially, in conditions of limited resources.

While preparing our research, we achieved all the tasks which were formulated in the beginning. The main result of our paper became derived 5 particular strategies of attracting and retaining subscribers of SaaS platforms with the subscription business model. These 5 strategies are based on the deep analysis of 16 Russian and foreign cases of implementing SaaS subscription model into business.

Finally, coming back to our research question “Will shifting from the traditional licensed model to the subscription model in the software business help attract new customers and turn old clients into subscribers?” we can definitely give a positive answer.

References

1. Bastian, K. (2014, September 15). The Subscription Economy: What It Is and How It's Changing The Way People Buy. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from Force Management

2. Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P.,&Evans, S.. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production(65), 43-45. Retrieved from Journal of Cleaner Production.

3. Bulygo, Z. (2013). How to Excel at the Subscription Economy. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from Kissmetrics Blog

4. Carraro G., Chong F. (2006, October). Software as a Service (SaaS): An Enterprise Perspective. Retrieved March 17, 2016, from Microsoft

5. CNews. (2015). Interview with Olivier Caisson. Retrieved May 7, 2016

6. CNews Analytic. (2015). The Russian SaaS market belongs to young IT companies. Retrieved March 17, 2016

7. CNews Analytics. (2015). Cloud services in 2015. Retrieved May 5, 2016

8. CNews Analytics. (2015). The largest SaaS providers in Russia in 2015. Retrieved April 17, 2016

9. Consulting, J'son&Partners. (2015, June 5). Global and Russian SaaS-Solutions Markets in B2B Segment. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Json.TV

10. de Miranda, P. G. (2010, October). Saas (software as a service)-infrastructures and applications in real scenarios. Retrieved March 17, 2016

11. Froberg, P. (n.d.). What is freemium? Retrieved March 13, 2016

12. G2Growd. (n.d.). Our company. Retrieved May 2016

13. Guth, D. (2015, August 28). Our Addiction to Subscriptions. Retrieved May 5, 2016

14. Hamari, J., Sjoklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved April 20, 2016

15. Harvey, K. (2016, January 6). Subscription Business Trend Predictions for 2016. Retrieved May 4, 2016

16. Hutzler, K. (August, January 10). The Rise of the Subscription Economy. Retrieved April 12, 2016, from Huffington Post

17. Jadhav, M. (2016, March 25). Top 5 Features To Look While Selecting SaaS Help Desk Software. Retrieved May 9, 2016

18. Janzer, A. (2015, January). Subscription Marketing. Retrieved April 2, 2016

19. Judson, S. (2015). How big is the subscription economy. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from Quora

20. Kaplan Andreas M. and Michael Haenlein. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 1(53), 59-69. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from http://michaelhaenlein.eu/Publications/Kaplan,%20Andreas%20-%20Users%20of%20the%20world,%20unite

21. Kari, V. (2014, May 5). The Pros and Cons of SaaS vs On-premises Deployment. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from Smartbridge

22. Key, D. (2013). SaaS Revenue Models Win in the Long Run. Retrieved March 18, 2016

23. Lebedev, P. (2015). SaaS: the crisis has not reached the desired depth. Retrieved May 7, 2016, from CNews

24. Lev-Ram, M. (2014, June 6). It's a subscription economy, and you're just living in it. Retrieved March 18, 2016

25. Longanecker, C. (2015, March 19). Why You Should Use a Subscription Business Model. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from Entrepreneur

26. Matofska, B. (2014). What is the Sharing Economy?. The People Who Share. Retrieved March 29, 2016

27. McCann, D. (2015, August 18). Adobe Completes Swift Business-Model Transformation. Retrieved May 8, 2016, from CFO

28. Moon, B. (2013, September 5). Zuora's whopping round shows the subscription economy is here to stay. Retrieved March 17, 2016, from Venture Beat

29. Nubera. (n.d.). The #1 Business Apps Discovery Network. Retrieved May 2016, from GetApp

30. Oracle. (2013). 5 Reasons to Consider SaaS. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from QuinStreet Executive Brief

31. Patel, N. (2014). How 9 SaaS Companies Hacked Their Growth. Retrieved March 17, 2016, from Kissmetrics Blog: https://blog.kissmetrics.com/9-saas-companies/

32. Patterson, M. (2010, May 10). Back to basics: the Difference between SaaS and Cloud Computing. Retrieved April 28, 2016, from IT World

33. PMR. (2015). Russian software market awaiting cloud expansion. Retrieved May 7, 2016

34. Pretty, S. (2014, July 10). 10 Best Practises for Online Subscription Business Models. Retrieved March 18, 2016, from Subbly

35. Pricewaterhouse Cooper. (2007). Software Pricing Trends: How vendors can capitalize on the shift to new revenue models. Retrieved March 17, 2016

36. Ramakrishnan, M. (2014, December 10). Five Ways Evernote Rocks the SaaS Freemium Business. Retrieved May 8, 2016

37. Rappa, M. (2008). Business models on the Web. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Digital Enterprise

38. Shanahan, M. (n.d.). The New Discipline in the Subscription Economy: Recurring Revenue Management. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Scout Analytics: http://research.scoutanalytics.com/subscriptions/the-new-discipline-in-the-subscription-economy-recurring-revenue-management/

39. Sheldon, P.&Varon, L. (2015). The Forrester Wave™: Subscription Billing Platforms, Q4 2015 (Rep.). Retrieved April 3, 2016

40. Singleton, D. (2011, July). What is SaaS? 10 Frequently Asked Questions About Software as a Service. Retrieved April 6, 2016

41. Sloat, T. (2015). An introduction to subscription finance. Retrieved April 5, 2016

42. StartPack. (n.d.). Startpack. Retrieved May 2016

43. Taei, P. (2015). How big is the subscription economy. Retrieved May 5, 2016

44. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning(43), 42.

45. Tzuo, T. (2012, December 7). The Subscription Economy Is About Strengthening Customer Relationships, Not Just Recurring Revenues. Retrieved March 29, 2016

46. Tzuo, T. (2015, March 10). The subscription economy: a business transformation. Retrieved March 15, 2016

47. Viswanathan, P. (2015, August 15). SaaS, PaaS and IaaS in the Mobile Industry. Retrieved May 8, 2016

48. Voyles, B. (2015, June 17). The Subscription Economy: Why Subscriptions are More Popular than Ever. Retrieved March 15, 2016

49. Warrillow, J. (2014, November 11). Why You Need to Consider the Subscription Model for Your Business. Retrieved April 14, 2016

50. Warrillow, J. (2015, February 5). The Automatic Customer: Creating a Subscription Business in Any Industry. Retrieved March 23, 2016

51. Whitler, K.A. (2016, January 19). How The Subscription Economy Is Disrupting The Traditional Business Model. Retrieved May 5, 2016

Application 1

Basic Cloud Computing structure

Resource: Bible of Cloud Computing

Application 2

CNews Analytics: The largest SaaS providers in Russia in 2015

¹

Company

City

Revenue from the providing SaaS services in 2014, thousand rubles

Revenue from the providing SaaS services in 2013, thousand rubles

Revenue growth 2014/2013 in %

The number of registered users of SaaS

Amount of commercial users

The share of commercial users

1

ÑÊÁ Êîíòóð

Ekaterinburg

5500000

4 477000

23%

1 125 000

í/ä

í/ä

2

Ìàíãî Òåëåêîì

Moscow

1350000

930 000

45%

áîëåå 250000

áîëåå 250000

100%

3

B2B-Center

Moscow

1155842

1056 611

9%

237 902

237 902

100%

4

Softline

Moscow

993 993

764 610

30%

í/ä

í/ä

í/ä

5

Áàðñ Ãðóï

Kazan

910 000

880 000

3%

í/ä

í/ä

í/ä

6

Êîðóñ Êîíñàëòèíã ÑÍÃ

St. Petersburg

602 825

456 435

32%

268 200

264 800

99%

7

Òåëôèí

St. Petersburg

317 900

270 400

18%

109 500

109 500

100%

8

Cloud4Y

Moscow

282 240

126 000

124%

2 480

2 232

90%

9

ÌîéÑêëàä*

Moscow

265 000

150 000

77%

í/ä

í/ä

í/ä

10

Àé-Òåêî

Moscow

231 839

224 200

3%

í/ä

í/ä

í/ä

11

Ìåãàïëàí

Moscow

150 364

104 334

44%

40 851

21 243

52%

12

ÈÒ-Ãðàä

St. Petersburg

113 420

53 000

114%

7 250

7 250

100%

13

amoCRM (Qsoft)

Moscow

85 000

29 000

193%

250 000

7 500

3%

14

Èíôîñèñòåìû Äæåò

Moscow

66 665

40 119

66%

í/ä

í/ä

í/ä

15

InSales

Moscow

62 000

45 000

38%

150 000

í/ä

í/ä

16

Ñòåê Ñîôò

Moscow

38 000

34 000

12%

55

55

100%

17

Êðîê

Moscow

22 425

81 316

-72%

100

100

100%

18

Teachbase

Moscow

22 000

16 000

38%

60 000

45 000

75%

19

ÐîñÁèçíåñÑîôò

Moscow

17 905

11 121

61%

1 600

1 600

100%

20

Ëàíêåé

Moscow

17 634

9 158

93%

3 831

3 831

100%

21

Áèçíåñ Ïðîåêòû

Moscow

16 969

8 130

109%

58 327

58 327

100%

22

BSTelecom (Áèçíåñ Ñèñòåìà Òåëåõàóñ)

Moscow

15 600

12 000

30%

190

190

100%

23

Îôèñ24

St. Petersburg

15 000

20 000

-25%

1 650

1 650

100%

24

ÖÈÒ Ðåãèîí

Moscow

14 410

7 028

105%

150

150

100%

25

Íàóìåí

Moscow

12 500

6 000

108%

10 000

1 200

12%

Resource News Analytics, 2015

Application 3

Resource: Global and Russian SaaS-Solutions Markets in B2B Segment research by J'son&Partners Consulting, 2015

Application 4

SaaS Solution

Kontur Elba

CRM Simple business

Category

Accounting

Unified cloud service for CRM

Business model

1.Subscription billing:

* Basic

* Business

* Premium

Annual payment

2.On-Premise

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

1. Subscription billing:

* Professional

* VIP

Monthly payment.

2.On-Premise

Customer Types:

* Small Business

* Large Enterprises

* Medium Business

Key idea

Online accounting for small business directors without accounting knowledge

Bring value to clients' businesses by making CRM an easy and understandable process

Landing Page (Official Site):

https://kontur.ru/elba

prostoy.ru

Simplicity

5/5

5/5

Usability

5/5

5/5

Utility

5/5

5/5

Call to action button

Yes

Yes

Service Features

Promotions

Yes

Yes

Compliance with law

Yes

Yes

Security and privacy

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Data backup

No

Backup in multiple locations

Team support: communication channels

Phone support

Email support

Online consultancy, feedback form

Diagnostic service

Blog

Phone support

Email support

Online consultancy, feedback form

Blog

Social accounts

Facebook, Youtube, Vkontakte

Facebook, Youtube, Vkontakte, Twitter, Odnoklassniky

Help Desk

videos, podcasts, webinars, FAQ-tutorial

FAQ-tutorial

Partnership programs

Yes

Yes

Online payment

Yes

Yes

Mobile app

No

Yes

Integration with popular cloud services and applications

No

No

User interface

Friendly

Friendly

installation and cuztomization

Simple

Simple

Crossplatform solution

Yes

Yes

Trial access

30 days free

30 days free

Free access with limited options

No

Yes

gamification

No

No

Additional extensions (applications)

Yes

No

English language

No

No

Company ideology

Yes

No

SaaS Solution

Mango Office

Bitrix24

Category

Business communications

Business collaborative tool

Business model

Subscription billing:

* Basic

* Classic

* Advanced

Montly payment

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Large Enterprises

Subscription billing:

* Plus

* Standart

* Professional

Montly payment

2. On-Premise

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Large Enterprises

Key idea

Help businesses establish a telephone connection

'Bitrix24 is a complete suite of social collaboration, communication and management tools for a team'

Landing Page (Official Site):

mango-office.ru

bitrix24.com

Simplicity

3/5

5/5

Usability

4/5

5/5

Utility

4/5

5/5

Call to action button

Yes

Yes

Service Features

Promotions

Yes

Yes

Compliance with law

Yes

Yes

Security and privacy

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Data backup

No

Backup in multiple locations

Team support: communication channels

Phone support

Email support

Online consultancy, feedback form

Phone support

Email support

Online consultancy

Diagnostic service

Blog

Forum

Social accounts

Facebook, Youtube, Vkontakte

Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Google+, LinkedIn

Help Desk

videos, podcasts, webinars, FAQ-tutorial, user's guidline

videos, training course, FAQ, webinars

Partnership programs

No

Yes

Online payment

Yes

Yes

Mobile app

No

Yes

Integration with popular cloud services and applications

Integration with CRM

Integration with Google Disk and Google apps

User interface

Friendly

Not-Friendly

installation and cuztomization

Simple

Hard

Crossplatform solution

Yes

Yes

Trial access

No

No

Free access with limited options

No

Yes

gamification

No

Yes

Additional extensions (applications)

No

Yes

English language

No

Yes

Company ideology

No

No

SaaS Solution

amoCRM

Megaplan

Category

CRM and transactions system

Business Management System

Business model

1.Subscription billing:

* Basic

* Advanced

* Professional

Montly payment

2. On-Premise

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

1.Subscription billing:

* Tasks

* Sales

* Business

Montly payment

2. On-Premise

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

Key idea

Simplify CRM processes

Control workflow. Take care of customers and finance.

Landing Page (Official Site):

amocrm.ru

megaplan.ru

Simplicity

4/5

3/5

Usability

3/5

2/5

Utility

3/5

4/5

Call to action button

Yes

Yes

Service Features

Promotions

No

No

Compliance with law

Yes

Yes

Security and privacy

Use of HTTPS protocol

Multifactor authentication

Use of HTTPS protocol

Multifactor authentication

Data backup

Backup in multiple locations

Backup in multiple locations

Team support: communication channels

Phone support

Email support

Phone support

Email support

Blog

Open Day

Online presentations days

Social accounts

Facebook, Youtube, Vkontakte, Twitter

Facebook, Vkontakte

Help Desk

User's guidline

videos, webinars, knowledge base, corporate courses, workshops

Partnership programs

Yes

Yes

Online payment

Yes

Yes

Mobile app

No

No

Integration with popular cloud services and applications

Integration with side widgets

Integration with 7 SaaS apps

User interface

Friendly

Not-Friendly

installation and cuztomization

Simple

Simple

Crossplatform solution

Yes

Yes

Trial access

14 days

14 days

Free access with limited options

No

No

gamification

No

No

Additional extensions (applications)

Yes

Yes

English language

No

Yes

Company ideology

No

No

SaaS Solution

PlanFix

Worksection

Category

Teamwork management

Collaboration&Productivity

Business model

Subscription billing:

* Team

* Community

* Studio

* Company Corporation

Monthly payment

Customer Types:

* Small Business

* Medium

* Business

* Project group

* Community

* Large enterprises

Subscription billing:

* Individual

* Optimal

* Corporate

* Premium

Monthly payment

Customer Types:

* Small Business

* Medium

Key idea

Give customers a chance to experience a new system without insisting on using it

It simplifies control, unloads the head, saves your time and protects nerve cells.

Landing Page (Official Site):

planfix.ru

worksection.com

Simplicity

5/5

5/5

Usability

5/5

5/5

Utility

5/5

5/5

Call to action button

Yes

Yes

Service Features

Promotions

No

Yes

Compliance with law

Yes

Yes

Security and privacy

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Data backup

Backup in multiple locations

Backup in multiple locations

Team support: communication channels

Email support

Online consultancy

Diagnostic service

Blog

Forum

Phone support

Email support

Feedback form

Blog

Social accounts

Facebook, Vkontakte, Twitter

Facebook, Twitter, Google+

Help Desk

No

User's guidline

Partnership programs

Yes

Yes

Online payment

Yes

Yes

Mobile app

No

Yes

Integration with popular cloud services and applications

Integration with 8 SaaS apps

Integration with Google Disk and Google apps

User interface

Friendly

Friendly

installation and cuztomization

Simple

Simple

Crossplatform solution

Yes

Yes

Trial access

30 days

30 days

Free access with limited options

Yes

Yes

gamification

No

No

Additional extensions (applications)

Yes

Yes

English language

Yes

Yes

Company ideology

Yes

No

SaaS Solution

Adobe Creative Cloud

Microsoft Office 365

Category

Digital media

Office suits

Business model

Subscription billing (shifted from On-Premise model)

For Business:

* Purchase from local retailers

For Individuals:

* Photography

* Single App

* All Apps

For Students and Teachers:

* Photography

* All Apps -- Special Offer

Monthly/annual payment

Customer Types:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Freelancers

* Students&Teachers

* Individual users

Subscription billing (shifted from On-Premise model)

For Business:

* Business Essentials

* Business

* Business Premium

For home:

* Home

* Personal

* Home&Student2016

Monthly/annual payment

Customer Types:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Large Enterprises

* Freelancers

* Academic institutions

* Non Profits

* Public Administrations

Key idea

'A whole new experience for digital media creation, enabling you to work lightning fast'

Office when and where you need it. Work anywhere, anytime, on any device. Office 365 is ready when you are.

Landing Page (Official Site):

http://www.adobe.com/

https://products.office.com/

Simplicity

5/5

5/5

Usability

5/5

5/5

Utility

5/5

5/5

Call to action button

Yes

Yes

Service Features

Promotions

Yes

Yes

Compliance with law

Yes

Yes

Security and privacy

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Data backup

Backup in multiple locations

Backup in multiple locations

Team support: communication channels

Phone support

Email support

Online consultancy, feedback form

User community

Blog

Phone support

Email support

Online consultancy, feedback form

Diagnostic service

Blog

Social accounts

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn

Help Desk

FAQs, Video Tutorials, User's guideline, Knowledge base

FAQs, Video Tutorials, User's guideline, Knowledge base

Partnership programs

Yes

Yes

Online payment

Yes

Yes

Mobile app

Yes

Yes

Integration with popular cloud services and applications

More than 30 apps

Yes

User interface

Friendly

Friendly

installation and cuztomization

Hard

Simple

Crossplatform solution

Yes

Yes

Trial access

30 days free

30 days free

Free access with limited options

No

No

gamification

No

No

Additional extensions (applications)

Yes

Yes

English language

Yes

Yes

Company ideology

Yes

Yes

SaaS Solution

Basecamp

Evernote

Category

Project management and collaboration tool

Content&Document managemnt

Business model

Subscription billing:

* Internal team

* Work with clients

* Enterprise

Montly /annual payment

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Large enterprise

* Project groups

Subscription billing:

* Basic

* Premium

* Business

Annual payment

Customer Type:

Small Business

* Medium Business

* Large Enterprises

* Private users

Key idea

'Everything in Basecamp is carefully considered'

Help manage all the important information in your life

Landing Page (Official Site):

basecamp.com

https://evernote.com

Simplicity

5/5

5/5

Usability

3/5

5/5

Utility

5/5

5/5

Call to action button

Yes

Yes

Service Features

Promotions

No

No

Compliance with law

Yes

Yes, Report on the information transparency

Security and privacy

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Data backup

Backup in multiple locations

Backup in multiple locations

Team support: communication channels

Newsletter

Email support

Feedback form

Blog

Email support

Feedback form

User community

Blog

Social accounts

Facebook, Twitter (active support), Instagram

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google+, LinkedIn

Help Desk

FAQs & Help Guides, Podcast

Educational desk with tutorials

Partnership programs

Yes

Yes

Online payment

Yes

Yes

Mobile app

Yes

Yes (+computer app)

Integration with popular cloud services and applications

With more than 30 SaaS solutions

With more than 30 SaaS solutions

User interface

Friendly

Friendly

installation and cuztomization

Simple

Simple

Crossplatform solution

Yes

Yes

Trial access

60 days

No

Free access with limited options

Yes

Yes

Gamification

Available soon

Yes

Additional extensions (applications)

Yes

Yes

English language

Yes

Yes

Company ideology

Yes

Yes

SaaS Solution

Xero

Aircall

Category

Accounting

Communication

Business model

Subscription billing:

* Starter

* Standart

* Premium

Montly

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Startup

Subscription billing:

* Starter

* Premium

* Enterprise

Montly/Annual payment

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Startup

Key idea

'We help small businesses thrive worldwide'

'Make your phone support easier'

Landing Page (Official Site):

https://www.xero.com

https://aircall.io/

Simplicity

5/5

5/5

Usability

5/5

5/5

Utility

5/5

5/5

Call to action button

Yes

Yes

Service Features

Promotions

No

No

Compliance with law

Yes

Yes

Security and privacy

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Data backup

Backup in multiple locations

Backup in multiple locations

Team support: communication channels

Phone support

Email support

User community, feedback form

Blog

Phone support

Email support

Online consultancy, feedback form

Diagnostic service

Blog

Social accounts

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google+, LinkedIn, Instagram

Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

Help Desk

videos, webinars, self-paced learning, Podcast

Demo in request, FAQ, Knowledge base

Partnership programs

Yes

Yes

Online payment

Yes

Yes

Mobile app

Yes

Yes

Integration with popular cloud services and applications

with more than 400 SaaS solutions

with 12 SaaS solutions

User interface

Friendly

Friendly

installation and cuztomization

Simple

Simple

Crossplatform solution

Yes

Yes

Trial access

30 days

14 days

Free access with limited options

No

No

gamification

No

No

Additional extensions (applications)

Yes

No

English language

Yes

Yes

Company ideology

Yes

Yes

SaaS Solution

Wrike

Zoho CRM

Category

Work management&Collaboartion

Business management system

Business model

Subscription billing:

* Professional

* Enterprise

Annual payment

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Startup

Subscription billing:

* Starter

* Professional

* Enterprise

Montly/Annual payment

Customer Type:

* Small Business

* Medium Business

* Startup

Key idea

'Go beyond traditional task and project management'

'Close more deals in less time'

Landing Page (Official Site):

https://www.zoho.com/

Simplicity

5/5

3/5

Usability

5/5

5/5

Utility

5/5

5/5

Call to action button

Yes

Yes

Service Features

Promotions

No

No

Compliance with law

Yes

Yes

Security and privacy

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Use of HTTPS protocol, privacy policy

Multifactor authentication

Data backup

Backup in multiple locations

Backup in multiple locations

Team support: communication channels

Blog

Consultation service

Email support

Blog

Users community

Email support

Social accounts

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google+, LinkedIn, Pinterest

Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

Help Desk

Knowledge base, video tutorials, webinars, tour of Wrike/demo

Educational desk: videos, webinars, tutorials, demo videos/tour

Partnership programs

Yes

Yes

Online payment

Yes

Yes

Mobile app

Yes

Yes

Integration with popular cloud services and applications

with more than 30 SaaS solutions

with more than 50 SaaS solutions

User interface

Friendly

Not-friendly

installation and cuztomization

Simple

Hard

Crossplatform solution

Yes

Yes

Trial access

14 days

15 days

Free access with limited options

Yes

No

gamification

No

No

Additional extensions (applications)

Yes

Yes

English language

Yes

Yes

Company ideology

Yes

Yes

Application 5

Clients' feedback collected from the next leading business software review platforms (G2Growd, GetApp, StartPack)

Solution

Prons

Cons

Feedback from

Kontur Elba

1. Efficient phone support

2. Friendly interface, responsive support

3. We are satisfied with the service security

4. Service is similar to regular mail service, so it is easy to understand, and there are enough features

https://startpack.ru/application/elba-accounting-for-entrepreneurs

CRM Simple business

One of the best in the CRM market.

2. The program is easy and convenient.

3. Feature set is impressive.

4. Quick expert help

5. Efficient responds

6. Support is one of the best in the Russian internet

7. You can create a site on a platform of 'Simple Business'

8. There is an adequate mobile version

9. Good regular updates

https://startpack.ru/application/prostoy-business

Mango Office

1. CRM is really inconvenient

2. Weak efficiency of support.

3. No individual approach.

4. Client orientation is at law level

5. Too big amount of reports

6. High prices comparing to competitors

http://iprating.ru/mango-office/

Bitrix24

1. Data storage with drives and

1. Bitrix administration panel is very complex. It is hard to use

2. Helpdesk doesn't answer fast enough

3. Poorly written interface

4. Support personal has difficulty communicating in English

https://www.g2crowd.com/products/bitrix24/reviews?&page=4

shared access is excellent.*

5. Customer service is dreadful.Response to issues inaccurate and/or not well explained

6. The lack of support, poor or lacking available tutorials which go through standard setup procedures

7. Design is really cheap

8. Could work better (about the amount of notifications and email)

9. The integration with google drive and google apps is not the best and can be improved

amoCRM

1. Not difficult to handle, is available to anyone

2. Easy entry - you can just start working after installation

1. Extremely weak technical team

2. All the problems are recorded, without any feedback of the decisions

3. Tech support does not know all the information about the product …they can't explain many things, and sometimes you have to explain how their program works

https://startpack.ru/application/amocrm-online

Megaplan

1.Good interface

1. Super slow tech support, your problems just kill few months

2. The same functionality can be found in lower-cost projects

3. Slow interface

4. Mobile applications is a nice bonus but a huge amount of spam is very annoying

https://startpack.ru/application/megaplan-business-automation

PlanFix

1. Easy and intuitive operation interface

2. Very flexible system. Set up is possible (and necessary) to fit your needs

3. Client oriented support.The feeling that a support is sitting next to you as they react very quickly. A team of PF considers your wishes and modifies the system to your needs

4. A blog with lots of information on how to operate the system

5. The correct ideology: nothing superfluous, the way to simplicity, at the same time, extensive customization options

1. No mobile application

https://startpack.ru/application/planfix-project-management

Worksection

1. No one was specially educated in the system, everything is intuitively understandable

2. Adequate team quite fast responds to suggestions of improvements

3. It is easy to stop use it as all data are saved

4. User-friendly interface and planning

5. Good mobile app

https://startpack.ru/application/worksection-project-management

Adobe Creative Cloud

1. Good idea of having all the package and that I could work and learn from all of them or at least some of them.

2. Each product provides more than enough tools for a graphic designer or prepress technician to get the job done

1. Piecemeal updates to some products and not others

2. It could be a better option to buy one or two of Adobe's products upfront rather than pay a monthly fee for software you won't use.

3. I do think the subscription model might be expensive and a turn off to those that may not need every single product available in the bundle.

4. The price is very expensive, especially for people that work as freelance

https://www.g2crowd.com/products/adobe-creative-suite/reviews

Microsoft Office 365

1. Nothing much to complain about, it works just fine

2. The access to mobile and outlook app has been a real improvement as my calendar and contacts finally sync properly

3. The ease of access and single version approach that this brings

4. This product is used all around the world

5. I really like the idea of paying a monthly cost and always having the most up-to-date software as opposed to paying a large up front cost every couple years 6. The apps developed to support 365 on iphone and ipad are pretty good and usable. 7. Excellent online support

https://www.g2crowd.com/products/office-365/reviews

Basecamp

1. Easy to use

2. Good web application

3. Nice onboarding very good looking

4. Fantastic customer help/support. Quick and informative.

5. Wish it was integrated with industry tools a bit more.

6. Good pricing, the option of free version

1. Over the years, BC became clumsy and slow

2. Weak development

3. Too many changes for the past year

https://www.getapp.com/project-management-planning-software/a/basecamp/

Evernote

1. I haven't come across any major flaws. I can't point out any feature that I dislike.

2. Evernote is quite easy to use and self-explanatory.

3. The free version is already feature-rich

1. No tool or tutorial to walk through quickly

2. No student discount for subscriptions

3. There are parts of Evernote that are user-friendly and then others just don't make sense, or aren't clear for the user.

4. It became seriously annoying with notifications about explaining new features

https://www.g2crowd.com/products/evernote/reviews?&page=5

Xero

1. Xero is clean, easy to use and feature rich.

2. A simpler platform that gets the job done

3. Being able to maintain all the bills and invoices online is perfect and reduces the paperwork in the office.

4. Cost effective product

1. The payroll aspect is not fully developed and can not compete with other dedicated payroll processors on price.

2. It is not necessarily intuitive, and you will need training from someone who knows what they are doing and I highly recommend working with an accountant who is familiar with it so that they can set it up and test it for you.

Aircall

1. Aircall app for iphone is very good and convenient as well.

2. Makes my job eassier and more professional

3. It's super simple to setup and use even for non-technical people

4. The user interface is really nice,

5. They are developing new features very quickly

6. Aircall actually has premium features without the premium cost

7. Simple, fast and with high level quality

8. The integration with Slack is also a huge bonus.

9. The team is very reactive: anytime we have a question, it's answered in the day.

1. Lack of cross platform support for phones

2. There are much cheaper solutions

https://www.g2crowd.com/products/aircall/reviews

Wrike

1. Plenty of educational materials on their blog

2. The support team is fantastic

3. Continues improvement

4. It helps bring a team together

5. The ease of use

6. The powerful set of features

1. Mobile apps don't mesh really well with the desktop client

2. The interface and usability do not feel very modern

3. 'Wrike Club' (lame rewards program) icons clutter up the interface

https://www.g2crowd.com/products/wrike/reviews

Zoho CRM

1. It has a lot of integrations and works great

2. More than enough functionality and flexibility to adapt to business

3. Very accessible price for this range of products

1. Paid mobile access not very fun to use

2. No sync account info with a contact

3. Getting started is not so easy

4. The UI is not very pleasant

5. Iphone app, Android app, ipad app fails to sync with the server.

https://www.getapp.com/customer-management-software/a/zoho-crm/reviews/

Application 6

ref.by 2006—2025
contextus@mail.ru