The Adverse Effects of Green Lawns

                     The Adverse Effects of Green Lawns

                                 An Essay By

                               Mekan Melyayev

                           English Composition 121

                              February 26, 2002

                 Essay: The adverse effects of green lawns.
      Lush, green, beautiful lawns surround almost every house in my
suburban neighborhood.  Green lawns are part of suburban culture.  Few
people consider the idea of not having one.  The Associated Landscape
Contractors of America, a trade group, claims, 'A properly installed and
maintained lawn gives homeowners a 100 to 200 percent return on their
investment and increases overall property values in the neighborhood'
(http://www.homestore.com).  Conversely, a poorly maintained lawn reduces
property values for the neighborhood.  Thus it makes sense to believe that
people who own lavish, evenly trimmed, green lawns with no weeds or insect
pests are good neighbors and responsible citizens.
      This, however, doesn’t mean that a nation of neighborhoods with such
lawns is a nation of good neighbors and responsible citizens.  Such
neighborhoods come with a hidden cost to society and to future generations.
 All homeowners know the price they personally pay to maintain their lawn.
But they might not know that, far from being a harmless means of
beautifying homes, the maintenance of lavish lawns has at least four
serious consequences for society: pesticide toxicity, fertilizer runoff,
water consumption and greenhouse gas production.
      Each year, 67 million pounds of pesticides are used on lawns across
the United States. This is about five to nine pounds of pesticide per acre
of lawn (Daniels Stivie, The Green Lawn Handbook, 8).  Pesticides are
chemicals that are used to kill insects that live in grass.  Even though
few people consider pesticides to be toxic or harmful to humans, U.S.
Senator Harry Reid of Nevada said “chemicals used in lawn care may cause
cancer, nerve damage, liver and kidney damage, birth defects, and even
death.” (The Use and Regulations of Lawn Care Chemicals, 2)
      Not many people are aware that lawn pesticides can be lethal. In a
Senate Hearing on the subject of pesticides, Thomas Prior of Maplewood,
Virginia talked about the death of his brother after exposure to
pesticides.  “He became grotesquely swollen; enormous blisters appeared on
his body; one by one his organs failed; his skin sloughed off and he became
blind. The pain was ceaseless and after fourteen excruciating days, he
died.”  (The Use and Regulation of Lawn Care Chemicals, 21)
      Lawn pesticides are harmful to wildlife, too. If pesticides can kill a
human being, then we can imagine what they can do to wildlife.  Seeing
geese, squirrels, prairie dogs, and rabbits is quite normal in suburbia.
These and many other animals naturally feed on grass, and lawns might seem
to be excellent food sources for them.  Diazinon (a type of pesticide) was
banned in 1986, because it resulted in the death of songbirds, waterfowl,
eagles, and other birds of prey (Daniels Stivie The Wild Lawn Handbook, 6).
      Lawns don’t absorb all the pesticides applied to them.  The rest are
washed into the water table, where they contaminate the drinking water.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, pesticides have been
found in the groundwater of dozens of states (The Use and Regulations of
Lawn Care Chemicals, 10).  This causes an increase in the price of drinking
water, because the government has to spend more money on purification.
      Fertilizer runoff is another major problem.  According to a study by
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, only about 50% of the
nitrogen and phosphorous in fertilizer is utilized by plants.  The rest is
dissolved in the groundwater.  When this runs into rivers, it causes
tremendous growth in the number of bacteria and microscopic plants
suspended in the water.  These organisms use the oxygen which would
normally be available for marine life.
      The portion of the Gulf of Mexico which receives the effluent of the
Mississippi River is so low in oxygen that it is referred to as a 'Dead
Zone'.  All fish and shrimp have abandoned this zone.  Marine animals,
which are not able to flee, such as ground feeders and worms, have died.
This dead zone is in the center of one of the most important commercial and
recreational fisheries in the United States (Flux and Sources of Nutrients
in the Mississippi – Atchafalaya River Basin, 4).
      As water is becoming a major issue of the new century, we continue
using water to irrigate our lawns. The average lawn requires about 10,000
gallons of water over the course of a summer to keep it green.  This water
is often diverted from other uses, such as agriculture.  By the year 2005,
at least 40% of the world’s population might face serious problems with
agriculture, industry or human health, if they rely only on natural
freshwater.  Severe water shortages could strike even water-rich countries
such as the United States (Scientific American, 42-43).
      Greenhouse gasses are produced both by the decomposition of grass
clippings, and by the use of lawnmowers.  Clippings disposed of in sealed
plastic bags are broken down into methane.  Methane traps over 21 times
more heat per molecule than carbon dioxide.  Most lawn mowers use two-
stroke gasoline engines, which are very inefficient at creating power from
hydrocarbon fuels, and are highly polluting (United States Environmental
Protection Agency, 2001).
      Thirty million acres, totalling roughly 468,750 square miles, are
devoted to American lawns (Jenkins Scott. The Lawn: A History of American
Obsession).  Individual homeowners cannot ignore the rights of their
neighbors to maintain the value of their homes, but as a nation we cannot
ignore the hidden costs of this use of resources.  Perhaps the solution to
this conundrum is to develop a new national consensus on what constitutes a
truly beautiful lawn.
                                 Works Cited

Daniels, Stivie. The Green Lawn Handbook. Macmillan: New York, 1995
Geleick, Peter. “Making Every Drop Count.” Scientific American Feb. 2001:
42-43
Jenkins, Scott. The Lawn: A History of American Obsession: Washington, DC:
1994
Lawn and Gardens. (2001): 9 pars.  23 Feb 2002 

United States Department of Commerce. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program. Flux and
Sources of Nutrients in the Mississippi – Atchafalaya River Basin. Series
17, Washington: GPO, 1999.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emmisions
from Mananagent of Selected Materials in Munipal Solid Waste. Washington:
GPO, 1998

United States Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. The Use
and Regulation of Lawn Care Chemicals. 101st  Cong., 2nd sess.  Washington:
GPO, 1990